The equity drill your students
can actually do between sessions.
EHS Poker Trainer gives your students a mathematically rigorous drill with a single objective score: deviation from ground truth. Assign it as homework. Track their rolling baseline. Show them, and yourself, measurable improvement.
One objective metric. Six ways to coach against it.
Raw deviation, not a vague score.
Students enter a precise 0–100 equity estimate. Scored on raw Δ from ground truth. No bands, no rounding. The metric you can actually coach against.
Rolling baseline proves improvement.
Per-student rolling average deviation, not a lucky run. You see the trendline, not the variance.
Assign the scenario, not just the hand.
Solo, 2-way, or 5-way equity dynamics. Target the spot your student is leaking in, like squeeze defense or multiway flop reads, without building scenarios from scratch.
Exact enumeration + Monte Carlo.
Heads-up runs exact enumeration. Multiway runs Monte Carlo across thousands of outcomes. Local, fast, and explainable to a student who asks.
Best Δ per difficulty × opponent.
Students compete against their own past best, not other students. Each combo (Pro · 5, Pro · 2, Amateur · Solo, etc.) tracks its own PR.
Pressure that mirrors the table.
Estimates are locked in 10 seconds, the same window as a live decision. Trains intuition, not pencil-and-paper math.
Assign → drill → review the baseline.
Stop saying "play more hands." Give your students a measurable drill with a number you both can point at next session.
- 01
Assign
Send your student a target, e.g. 30 Pro · 2-opponent runs this week. They drill on their own time, on web or Chrome extension.
- 02
Drill
Students take the 10-second equity drill at their own pace. Each run logs raw Δ from ground truth into the Performance Journal.
- 03
Review
Open the next session with their rolling baseline. Discuss the direction they're systematically wrong, not the lucky single hand.
"Are they actually improving?"
Now you can answer that.
A fully worked example of what you'd see for a student two months into structured homework. Rolling baseline trending down. Variance still there. Improvement, measurable.
Mocked data · representative of the Performance Journal export
I can assign this as homework and actually see whether students are improving their baseline. The deviation score is exactly what I needed.
Built for players who take the math seriously.
Unlimited runs, Pro mode precision, full Performance Journal. Coaches typically run annual. Students typically start monthly.
- Unlimited training runs
- Pro mode with decimal precision scoring
- Full Performance Journal · 30-day rolling baseline
- Personal records per difficulty × opponent
On every plan, including Free: exact enumeration + Monte Carlo engine, raw deviation (Δ) from ground truth, and solo, 2- and 5-opponent scenarios.
Questions coaches ask.
What math engine is behind the deviation score?
What exactly do my students see?
Annual or monthly: what do coaches usually pick?
Measure your students' equity intuition.
Prove they're improving.
Start Pro and assign your first drill today. Track the rolling baseline. Prove the work.